SEARCH
0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Prev | Current Page 486 | Next

James Luetkehoelter

"Pro SQL Server Disaster Recovery"


nTip Don??™t waste time analyzing and documenting obvious risks that have been addressed already. Known
issues and deficiencies have the highest risk rating possible. If you know you aren??™t currently backing up
your system and you know you really should be, it??™s comical to think that you should take the time to identify
the impact of not having a backup??”just do something. That doesn??™t mean you shouldn??™t include it in the
documentation of your overall plan, but don??™t bother analyzing what you already know.
I??™ve defined risk as a combination of likelihood of occurrence vs. the impact of occurrence.
It sounds like I might have a mathematical formula in mind; I do. Don??™t worry,
though; you won??™t need a degree in statistical analysis or actuarial science. I have very
simple formulas in mind. I do think it??™s important to quantify things somehow, and not
just because I??™m a database geek and like to quantify things. Without quantification, setting
a priority list is simply a judgment call. If left this way, you open the door for political
squabbling as to who is in the best position to make the judgment call (I??™ll discuss this
more in Chapter 12).


Pages:
474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498
druga wojna światowa Free English grammar and study guid hotel jelenia góra Russian bride counter strike 1.6