SEARCH
0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Prev | Current Page 261 | Next

James Luetkehoelter

"Pro SQL Server Disaster Recovery"

As with the previous scenario in
which minimal data loss was the goal, proper naming conventions and cataloging are
a must.
Another key risk is the off-site storage. Where is it? Is it environmentally protected?
Is it secure? Keeping the backup tapes at someone??™s house is definitely a start and better
than nothing, but that has plenty of risks in and of itself. I once had a client whose twoyear-
old tried to jam a backup tape in a VCR.
Table 5-4 shows the risks inherent in this scenario.
Table 5-4. Risk Breakdown for a Flexible-Portability Scenario
Risk Worst-Case Impact Best-Case Impact
Data loss Possibly months??™ worth of data Almost zero data loss
Restore time A restore over every data file and all A single file restore, plus log files
of the log files
Perceived The length of a complete restore If the data file is in a filegroup that??™s
downtime accessed infrequently, possibly zero
perceived downtime
CHAPTER 5 n CREATING A BACKUP/RECOVERY PLAN 134
Scenario: Specific Tables Only
In SQL Server 6.5, you could back up and restore a single table. Once SQL Server 7.0 came
out, that functionality was removed.


Pages:
249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273
hotel jelenia góra Russian bride Free English grammar and study guid powiekszenia wielkoformatowe counter strike 1.6