SEARCH
0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Prev | Current Page 254 | Next

James Luetkehoelter

"Pro SQL Server Disaster Recovery"

To minimize the likelihood of stress-related errors,
respond to the ???looking over your shoulder??? syndrome by having another set of (technical)
eyes watch what you??™re doing.
Given the proposed backup scheme (in Full Recovery mode), Table 5-2 shows what
the risk matrix would look like.
CHAPTER 5 n CREATING A BACKUP/RECOVERY PLAN 130
Table 5-2. Risk Breakdown for a Fast-Restore Scenario
Risk Worst-Case Impact Best-Case Impact
Data loss Data lost to the last good full backup Data lost since the last transaction log
and the associated differential backups backup
Restore time Mistakes made during restore require The time of a full backup restore, one
multiple attempts at a full backup restore differential restore, and a tail-log
restore
Perceived Restore time plus an application recon- Restore time only
downtime figuration required
Scenario:Minimal Loss Desired
Data means everything. Minimal data loss is usually mutually exclusive with the fastest
restore time possible.
nNote SQL Server 2005 is marketed as having ???Always On Technologies.??? It??™s true that there are some
fantastic improvements in the areas of high availability (some of which I??™ll cover in the next half of the book),
but that focus draws attention away from the backup/restore scenario in which minimal data loss is the
goal.


Pages:
242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266
druga wojna światowa Free English grammar and study guid hotel jelenia góra Russian bride counter strike 1.6