SEARCH
0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Prev | Current Page 120 | Next

Jonathan Jacky, Margus Veanes, Colin Campbell, Wolfram Schulte

"Model-Based Software Testing and Analysis with C#"

In
our sandbox implementation, simulated events were generated by the user (through
the Simulator class, Figures 3.5 and 3.6) or by the test fixture (Figure 3.7). In the
model, we cannot use a .NET timer as we did in the simulator, because the time-out
events must be scheduled by the tools.
Actions
There is an action in the model program for every event handler in the implementation??™s
Controller class: Reset, Poll, and so on. The enabling conditions
for these actions are the same as the guards in the implementation: ResetEnabled,
PollEnabled, and so on. There is no action in the model corresponding to the implementation??™s
DispatchHandler method; its control structure is implicit in the enabling
conditions.
There is also an action for each kind of event that the reactive program handles. In
the implementation, there is a single method ReceiveEvent with a cevent parameter
that indicates what kind of event occured. Our several event actions correspond
to different invocations of ReceiveEvent with different values for cevent. In the
model, it turns out to be simpler to define a different action for each type of event,
because each has a different enabling condition and makes different updates to the
model state. In fact, there are more of these action methods than event types. For the
Timeout event, we have the actions Timeout, TimeoutMsgLost, and TimeoutMsgLate.


Pages:
108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132
hotel jelenia góra Russian bride Free English grammar and study guid powiekszenia wielkoformatowe counter strike 1.6